DHH is off the rails and, in his latest, reveals with his "both sides" argument that he doesn't understand science either.
What is science, if not an adversarial process by which we seek an ever-closer understanding of the truth through critical review from all sides? How can we follow The Science, if we do not subject it to such pressures? What kind of science do we get if we don't?
DHH This swapping of roles is making me dizzy